"We live in a beautiful world.... Yeah, we do; yeah, we do."
About this Entry
Posted by: BoureeMusique

Visit BoureeMusique's Xanga Site

Original: 9/30/2010 8:19 AM
Views: 52
Comments: 10
eProps: 8

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
jsolberg
douglasg610
Shahrazad1973
prairiecowboy


Thursday, September 30, 2010

Back on the Bandwagon

 

(I only wish more people were in the band.)

**edit: Would it help if I avoided the "sin" language? I'm really interested in *your* opinion. Yes, you!

I'm reading an article this morning. The Nation did an interview with the executive director of Greenpeace. I'm not even done reading it yet, but a few sections insisted that I share them. I emailed snippets and the link to church friends and I googlechatted with an activist friend of mine in northeast Ohio. Let me extend the conversation to this sphere as well.

"The uncomfortable reality is that if we are to deliver the quality of life that folks in the US and other developed countries enjoy, and that the elites in other developing countries enjoy, we would need eight planets. Six to eight planets. Just think about that for a minute. Because even we in the progressive movement need to realize that if we are serious about creating a sustainable and just world for our kids and grandkids, we have to realize that we also have to challenge certain assumptions we have about our consumption patterns. And the inequality of consumption of stuff is just overwhelming. What North America and Europe spend on cat food annually will provide three nutritional meals to the entire African continent every single day. And I've got nothing against, obviously, pets. But the inequity is completely unsustainable."

Some people refuse to believe that we're running out of resources. (And I can direct them to many convincing arguments that we are.) Many who do actually see that energy use is a problem think that new technologies will save us (eventually... and I'm skeptical of that one). Right now, though, we're chasing our own tails, consuming ourselves like snakes,




and we're - dare I use such language - sinning. It doesn't matter if you think we can eventually make our way of life sustainable. Right now it isn't. The world has not collapsed, but every day people die because of our way of life. (But people die every day for lesser reasons anyway.) So what? That's not the point. Two wrongs don't make a right. Life is terminal (and occupants of the U.S. could stand to learn that lesson more than most). Death will come to us all one day. But there's no reason to kill people and animals and plants right now needlessly. I'm not a vegetarian. I eat (living) plants. I rely on the death of other creatures to survive. But I try to be mindful of the sacrifices, to be aware of what, how, and why I consume. To be thankful. I overuse and abuse my gifts. I "sin" as much as other people in the U.S. I encourage us to do this less, to slow down, to eventually stop. It's gonna take a lot of work, a lot of people loving each other, a lot of (sustainable) communities. Places where you leave the world, the land, the same as or better than you left it - not where you (we) consume everything and leave desolation. Matter can neither be created nor destroyed, but we're certainly permuting a lot of it out of whack in ways that will require more energy (and more resources) than we can harness to "correct." I could go on (and have in several edits of this post already). Instead, I'll open the floor to you to pick up where I left off.

Naidoo also says,

"Let me make a very controversial statement that I might regret. I don't think environmental organizations will win the challenge of environmental justice on their own. I think it will only be won if environmental activism becomes more broad-based activism where environmentalism is located in a broader framework of social justice, economic justice and so on."

It floors me that this statement is still controversial. I'm taking bits of this blog to my church, to my social justice committee there.
 Posted 9/30/2010 8:19 AM - 52 Views - 8 eProps - 10 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

10 Comments

Visit jsolberg's Xanga Site!
No dear, sometimes there's simply no other word for it, Sin can be used defined without reference to any religious framework. I've even seen cats 'sin', attempting to live a parasitic non-sustainable life eating the filters from the twice-daily cow-milking operation which we tossed out in the corn-field (also a sin) They'd last about two weeks before they died, stuffed with indigestible cellulose. This has been my metaphor for sin since age five. In fact, my childhood conviction that I was indeed the Messiah was mainly centered on my convincing my Dad to let me throw the 'attractive nuisances' into a sink-hole instead, thereby redeeming generations of felines from constipational purgatory.
So bravo for taking back the terminology, Emily
Posted 9/30/2010 10:16 AM by jsolberg Xanga True Member - recommend - reply

Visit douglasg610's Xanga Site!
nuh-uh
The word "sin" has been used for anything from pre-marital you-know-what to the eating of mid-diet donuts. It's time you people picked another word for what we do to the earth because my first reactions to the word (outside of synagogues) are:
--"Yay! More [you-know-what]!"
AND
--"Get your pamphlets out of my FACE!"
Regarding the 8-earths myth: we will never have this kind of social justice UNTIL the things we need are that easy to obtain that they can all come from one earth. Many people in charge couldn't give a toss about this, and don't mind if these people live in squalor. I mention this because I--dependent as I am on GMO crops and cheap shoes--am not the only one who would really like a bunch of low-wage workers making everything I own cheaper. Until we get to the idea that it SHOULD be done, no one will give a damn about how it CAN be.
To tie back to that quote in blue: the sad reality is that social justice, economic justice, and environmental justice are big dense problems that will take ages to solve. Until the world at-large gives a damn--only then will they be truly solved.
Posted 9/30/2010 10:54 AM by douglasg610 - recommend - reply

Visit BoureeMusique's Xanga Site!

@douglasg610 - 

You're right. Now how do we convince people to give a damn? I have a book full of sad examples of how the civilized world destroys life coming (through civilization) to my apartment this week. Expect heavy quote-age.
Posted 9/30/2010 11:15 AM by BoureeMusique Xanga True Member - recommend - reply

Visit douglasg610's Xanga Site!
Well, you've got three reasons not to use the world as replacement Toilet Paper:
--The laborers of the world are stronger than the the white-collar types, and there're BILLIONS of them. guerilla warfare against pissed-off indigents is a BIG waste of military power, and a HUGE annoyance, because they can hide everywhere, can strike anything, and we have no idea where to hit them (see also, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan).
--The poor can MAKE our stuff, but they can't BUY it. The market disparity means that we have to go after them with junk. And WHILE that works okay in theory, the idea that EVERYONE can buy this junk creates some distressingly poor things on the market today.
--They might be sitting on things we consider useful, like diamonds*. This is a separate problem from the guerilla warfare in general: If we NEED the diamonds*, not the people, the war is more intense and difficult because the native poor have NOTHING to lose. Also, people who DO give a damn start crying, "No war for diamonds*!"
*Substitute any valuable, earth-based substance, such as gold, oil, natural gas, wild scenic vistas, etc. OH!
--The land they live on is often prettier. In this case, the desolation that guerilla warfare causes (e.g. defoliants, landmines, etc.) spoils the victory.
Posted 9/30/2010 11:24 AM by douglasg610 - recommend - reply

Visit Shahrazad1973's Xanga Site!
Excellent post, excellent points. The sad truth is, I don't think the majority of those who can advance the change will, until they must. At which point, it may be too late. Too much stuff, too easy, too convenient, too fast. It's all a problem. In order to change this, worldviews will have to change. The citizens of developed nations in particular will have to reconsider what "quality of life" looks like.
Posted 9/30/2010 12:50 PM by Shahrazad1973 Xanga Premium Member - recommend - reply

Visit BoureeMusique's Xanga Site!

@Shahrazad1973 - 

Thanks, Naomi. I think you're right about ease and necessity being the mother of invention and about having to experience a paradigm shift about first-world quality of life. I'm glad you chimed in here. I hope to keep the discussion going, but it seems to happen in fits.
Posted 9/30/2010 1:13 PM by BoureeMusique Xanga True Member - recommend - reply

"[Y]ou've got three reasons not to use the world as replacement Toilet Paper". Those are pretty good reasons, so why does our world grow increasing feculent? Most people, including the billions of exploited poor, have been impressed with the story that they just need to work hard and cut a deal in order to be elevated to the exploiting class; or the less pleasant version of the story that tells them that even if they can't get that high, they still need to compete tooth and nail with their neighbors; or, at the most brutal edge of the story, that they will face displacement or murder (their choice) if they don't get out of the way of progress.

Submitting to any part of that story: this is the sin to which Emily refers, and in recognizing it we are forced to recognize that this sin is not limited to those who do the exploiting, but is present in any of us who have not rejected a culture of endless competition, endless growth, endless taking from the world and from our neighbors. In the Christian tradition, we call this sin theft, and it is often supported by its companions jealousy, deception, murder, and the elevation of ourselves to a place of reverence. Our response should be to recognize it, call it out, ask that it be excised from our own lives, and then work to help others engage in this same process.

'The citizens of developed nations in particular will have to reconsider what "quality of life" looks like.' Amen. And I hope that in this new consideration, we will genuinely realize how beautiful it will be to be free of the crushing weight of this corruption in our lives, and instead to be living for others instead of at the expense of others.
Posted 9/30/2010 1:26 PM by John L. Clark (site) - recommend - reply

Visit prairiecowboy's Xanga Site!
I heard the word sin used on NPR tonight and I near drove off the road!  Such blunt ideology for a modern relativistic society. Do you suppose right and wrong will ever make a comeback?
Posted 10/1/2010 10:30 PM by prairiecowboy Xanga True Member - recommend - reply

Visit BoureeMusique's Xanga Site!

@prairiecowboy - 

I do hope so. I don't believe that morality is relative, but I believe that situations are unique. It's an interesting distinction.
Posted 10/4/2010 8:58 AM by BoureeMusique Xanga True Member - recommend - reply

Visit douglasg610's Xanga Site!

@prairiecowboy - 


If we can have a "war on poverty," then we can make anything a sin.
Posted 10/4/2010 9:29 AM by douglasg610 - recommend - reply


Sign in to CommentChoose Identity
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)

(?)

Back to BoureeMusique's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in BoureeMusique's local time zone:
GMT -06:00 (Central Standard - US, Canada)